DEEP AUTUMN FLOWERS: PROGRAM

Ghosts of Tom Paine: Decadal Review of Bush v. Gore (2000) [Post of Dec. 12, 2010]
INITIAL POSTS (June 2010):
Immoral Maxims of An Unjust Judge: Rhetorical Repartees and Constitutional Arguments Discrediting and Refuting Both the Quips and Substance of Antonin Scalia's Legal Opinions. Several Components: Maxims & Repartees; Appendices; References
ADDITIONAL POSTS
Spiritual Intersections: Nietzsche's Aphorisms and Jesus Words (August 2010)
Henry Clay (Oct 2010)
PLANNED POSTS:
Essays on Distinctions and Tensions between literal, parablefull, metaphorical and mythological religious language



OCCASIONAL POSTS"
Book Reviews (Supreme Court; Friedrich Nietzsche…)




Sunday, June 27, 2010

Immoral Maxims of an Unjust Judge (Contents)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[RE: Antonin Scalia’s Judicial Maxims: Rhetorical Counters and Constitutional Arguments]
PRELUDE
1. THE COVENANT
2. THE OATH
3. THE TEXT OF THE CHARTER
4. THE FOUNDER'S CONSTITUTION AND OUR CONSTITUTION
5. 5th & 14th AMENDMENT: Due Process
6. 1st AMENDMENT: The Establishment Clause
7. 1st AMENDMENT: Freedom of Speech & $Power
8. 8th AMENDMENT: Cruel & Unusual Punishment
9. 9th AMENDMENT: Unenumerated Powers
10. 8th AMENDMENT: The Death Penalty
11. THE 14th AMENDMENT MISUSED
12. THE FOUNDER'S VISION
13. GETTYSBURG ADDRESS & CIVIL WAR AMENDMENTS
14. LIBERTY & THE CONSTITUTION

FOOTNOTES
CASES CITED
BIBLIOGRAPHY: BOOKS AND ARTICLES

APPENDIX A - COMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX B - MULTIPLE IMPLICATIONS OF WORDS: A PRIMER
APPENDIX C - RATIONAL PUNISHMENT: REASON v. REVENGE
APPENDIX D - DEAD SPOTS IN SCALIA’S CONSTITUTION
APPENDIX E - CASUISTRY IN SCALIA’S REASONING
APPENDIX F - OPAQUE TENSIONS & STRUCTURAL CONTRADICTIONS IN SCALIA’S THOUGHT
APPENDIX G - ECCE HOMO

No comments:

Post a Comment

Criticism and Comments on Content and Form are appreciated.